RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
hv novak equivalent?
Old
  (#1)
ozmatt
RC-Monster Stock
 
Offline
Posts: 16
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: melbourne
hv novak equivalent? - 03.14.2005, 04:19 AM

What is the equivalent brushless lenner/warrior setup to the hv novak brushless setup?
Also the emaxx can supposedly run at 30mph with twin 7cells in standard config, and then hv novak claims 32 to 38 mph. In oz dollars that is an expensive extra few mph, has anybody tried to lighten their truck and gain a similar speed?

Hopefully somebody has some ideas, sorry but since I'm in oz i suspect that i will be asleep when you guys may be online.
By the way, the site is great, good ideas and I haven't found any slanging matchs yet which is a refreshing change.

Thanks for the welcome also.

regards matt
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
RC-Monster Mike
Site Owner
 
RC-Monster Mike's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,915
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
03.20.2005, 02:25 PM

Matt,
There are a few folks that have reached 35+ mph with the stock e-maxx drivetrain. It is much easier to accomplish this with a brushless system, though. You could look at it as if it is an expensive way to achieve a few mph, but there are several other benefits in addition to the speed/power increase. Runtime/efficiency is one such advantage. Also, the brushless systems require little to no maintenance (while the titans will wear out) and will perform equally well years down the road. For similar performance to the Novak HV system, I would say the Lehner basicxl 2400 or 2800 motor and warrior 9918 controller would be a close matchup. These systems can take more voltage as well, so they could easily drastically outperorm the Novak, but on 12 cells, they would be close in performance (2800 will likely be slightly faster).
   
Reply With Quote
Thanks
Old
  (#3)
ozmatt
RC-Monster Stock
 
Offline
Posts: 16
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: melbourne
Thumbs up Thanks - 03.20.2005, 03:44 PM

Thanks for the info mike, anyh ideas when the 9918 will be avaliable?
Matt
   
Reply With Quote
Disregard previous mail mike
Old
  (#4)
ozmatt
RC-Monster Stock
 
Offline
Posts: 16
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: melbourne
Disregard previous mail mike - 03.20.2005, 03:46 PM

Sorry, just read the submit info line, disregard the previous post
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
RC-Monster Mike
Site Owner
 
RC-Monster Mike's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,915
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
03.20.2005, 04:01 PM

Should get the warriors tomorrow.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
camra88
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
03.20.2005, 10:50 PM

oh cool, i cant wait! I'm going to be purchaseing the 9918, 9l, UBEC, and a pinion for the 5mm motor, as well as the motor clamp/heatsink. What i want to know, is when will you get the pinion gears for the 5mm shafts available, and also when the heatsink/clamp will be available for purchase?

Thanks!
   
Reply With Quote
9l or lenner 2400
Old
  (#7)
ozmatt
RC-Monster Stock
 
Offline
Posts: 16
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: melbourne
Question 9l or lenner 2400 - 03.21.2005, 04:18 AM

Mike, you suggest the lenner motor not the cheaper 9l, your experience makes me ask why?

With the novak being $280 and the 9918/9l combo being about the same, why go the lenner, does it have more performance, does it give longer run times, reliabity etc.

Sorry to ask so many questions but a lot of the threads dont deal with this directly. By the way, happy for any others comments.

matt
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
RC-Monster Mike
Site Owner
 
RC-Monster Mike's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,915
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
03.21.2005, 09:19 AM

The Lehners will get a better runtime and have slightly less torque than the Fegao "L" motors. They are a smaller motor, which may also accelerate a touch quicker, and they can achieve a slightly better efficiency (hence the longer runtime). This question was regarding a Novak equivilent. The Lehners I suggested will most closely resemble the Novak's performance on 12 cells. The Feigao 10L and 9L will also be close, but with slightly less runtime. Either is a good choice for sure. In terms of bang for your buck, the Feigao motors are tough to beat.
   
Reply With Quote
Thanks
Old
  (#9)
ozmatt
RC-Monster Stock
 
Offline
Posts: 16
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: melbourne
Thanks - 03.21.2005, 04:15 PM

Mike, as i read on another post, you don't often get such help from business, and you've been the most helpful. something for all business's to follow.

Thanks heaps for all the replies and info, matt
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
RC-Monster Mike
Site Owner
 
RC-Monster Mike's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,915
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
03.21.2005, 04:45 PM

My pleasure, Oz!
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com