 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 3,794
Join Date: May 2005
Location: georgia
|
RC Pro finally gets it -
01.05.2009, 03:24 AM
They reworked the Mt class into an extreme class, with seemingly no battery voltage limit, at least it doen't mention one. There are two new classes on the list, 1/8 E-buggy and 1/8 E-arena truck (truggy) Both have this in the rules
Quote:
In the RC Pro Rules for E-Buggy and Truggy
Motor – Brushless no limitation. Sensored or sensorless.
Batteries – 4S, 5S or 6S lipo. No MAH limit. Batteries must be in good physical shape no cut, damaged or swollen pack allowed. Hard cases not required. Batteries must be secured properly in the vehicle, strapped or clamped into place before the event begins.
|
Nice to see they are loosening up, I know some would like to see higher Voltages, but its a start. This gives me all the motivation to convert my Losi 8T truggy to electric and fix up my G2R for the race wars. I plan to send an Email and ask for specific voltage for MT (extreme) and will report back on what i find.
edit; I just heard back from Carlton Epps Of RC Pro. Here was my question and his answer
Is there a max voltage on the class? There are for the E-1/8 buggy and E-1/8 arena truck (max 6s lipo), Will this be the same for the MT class?thanks
his answer
The max 6S is specific for the 1/8 buggy there are no size limitations for the Monster Truck class.
this will make things intresting in the MT class
Work because i gotta, play because i wanna
People here hate Nitro, I love it. I start it, run it about 50 ft from me and it dies, I go after it. Perfect exercise
Last edited by crazyjr; 01.05.2009 at 04:41 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supermaxx
Offline
Posts: 2,031
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
|
01.05.2009, 05:45 AM
That's great news. This will greatly increased the demand for 1/8 scale ESCs and better batteries. Good for us and better when the prices come down due to competition.
Novak is probably kicking themselves in the ass for not joining the sensorless bandwagon earlier  .
Castle Neu 1520 on 6S LiPo Powered Gmaxx (Nitro Killer)
Predator with OS .21TM
Supermaxx with Mach .26
Revo with OS .18TZ
Kyosho ST-RR Conversion
Ofna CR with Tekin ESC/Motor (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,061
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks CA
|
01.05.2009, 10:17 AM
Maybe. They have to join the "good motor bandwagon" before they can go to sensorless, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Something, anything, nothing
Offline
Posts: 2,747
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
01.05.2009, 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by George16
Novak is probably kicking themselves in the ass for not joining the sensorless bandwagon earlier  .
|
Novak has been extra quiet lately.
Has to hurt though that no major manufacturer features the HV in their electric vehicles yet CC scored probably two of the biggest possible deals out there with the Revo and Savage. I always thought and still believe Novak's arrogance is what is holding them back, just like the big 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 225
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charlotte NC
|
01.05.2009, 09:20 PM
Novak is going to have to come out with a new motor and speed control if they want to compete in 1/8th scale electric.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 3,794
Join Date: May 2005
Location: georgia
|
01.06.2009, 03:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by macr0w
Novak is going to have to come out with a new motor and speed control if they want to compete in 1/8th scale electric. 
|
I don't think so, I have run Novak hv (4400), they were nice. I think the Novak might have an advantage, smaller rotor, sensored, possibly lighter weight. I love my neu/quark combo, but the novak might be better on dirt, just because they are less torquey and better mimick a nitro engine as far as powerband. That's what i remember about the novak i had, With the lipo cut-off they can now compete.
that said, its going to be an intresting year
Work because i gotta, play because i wanna
People here hate Nitro, I love it. I start it, run it about 50 ft from me and it dies, I go after it. Perfect exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster RC8T
Offline
Posts: 2,554
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Syracuse, New York (Camillus)
|
01.06.2009, 05:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyjr
I don't think so, I have run Novak hv (4400), they were nice. I think the Novak might have an advantage, smaller rotor, sensored, possibly lighter weight. I love my neu/quark combo, but the novak might be better on dirt, just because they are less torquey and better mimick a nitro engine as far as powerband. That's what i remember about the novak i had, With the lipo cut-off they can now compete.
that said, its going to be an intresting year
|
I kinda agree with this. As much as I love my MMM/TeknoNeu the Novak HV motors aren't that horrible. The smaller rotor and less torque is a little easier to control on dirt. If it came down to being limited to 4s for racing I would def consider one of their motors, run it without the sensor with my MMM. The HV esc on the other hand is the weak link!
RC-Monster RC8T 1515 2.5D/MMM/5s RC-M 4500mah
SC10 MMPro 13.5T 2s NeuEnery 5000mah
RC18T Mamba 25/5400kv 2s lipo + 6s NiMh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Something, anything, nothing
Offline
Posts: 2,747
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
01.07.2009, 10:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyjr
but the novak might be better on dirt, just because they are less torquey and better mimick a nitro engine as far as powerband.
|
Was looking back and although I have never used a quark, I always have heard good things about their power delivery. However I think some of the advantages that can be brought via the Novak HV can also be had via the MMM/MM without the disadvantages of the Novak system. With the ability to change so many parameters of the MMM in regards to start up, timing, braking percentages, throttle curve, and braking curbve, I think it is fairly easy to come up with an optimum setting for each situation. I can personally testify to the smooth startup of the CC firmware in the new MMM and MM and find it every bit as smooth as any of the Novak's I tried.
Keep in mind I am not dogging you for using the Novak, I am only criticising what I believe are faults of Novak as a corporation. I think eveyrone should use what ever suits them best and/or they like the best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Brushless
Offline
Posts: 2,466
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
|
01.06.2009, 10:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasSP
Novak has been extra quiet lately.
Has to hurt though that no major manufacturer features the HV in their electric vehicles yet CC scored probably two of the biggest possible deals out there with the Revo and Savage. I always thought and still believe Novak's arrogance is what is holding them back, just like the big 3.
|
I agree. Not only has Castle scored with the BL E-Revo and Savage Flux, they already had a bit of marketshare in the RTR 1/10th market with the smaller Flux (Sidewinder) in some of HPI's other vehicles. I'm not sure that Novak has a system in any RTR vehicle these days, brushed or brushless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,061
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks CA
|
01.06.2009, 10:55 AM
They do make Traxxas's brushed ESCs i think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Brushless
Offline
Posts: 2,466
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
|
01.06.2009, 11:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BL_RV0
They do make Traxxas's brushed ESCs i think.
|
Nope. The XL-5 and EVX2 are both manufactured by Traxxas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Something, anything, nothing
Offline
Posts: 2,747
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
01.06.2009, 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BL_RV0
They do make Traxxas's brushed ESCs i think.
|
I always find it funny how everyone thinks Traxxas is so stuck to Novak. The truth is the only ESC ever made by Novak for Traxxas was the original EVX which was serviced and warrantied by Traxxas. For some reason though everyone thinks Traxxas has a deep relationship with Novak.
I remember specifically people swearing and flaming me when I suggested Traxxas would not use Novak for their brushless endeavor's but low and behold, they don't.
Novak has several things against them in my opinion which all derive from arrogance:
1. The technology they offer is typically old and improvements are slow to come out
2. Novak's prices are too high on the products they offer
3. Novak's CS is no where near the level they used to have
4. Novak refuses to follow the market and have good forward looking planning for what they offer
5. Novak has failed to use it's enormous influence on ROAR to forsee and improve the market, it's a very short sited business strategy setup only to capitalize on today with no consideration of tomorrow.
Racing is a small percentage of the hobby world and even racer's will only sit around and be held back so long. Bashing and sport drive's the RC market today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,061
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks CA
|
01.05.2009, 10:32 AM
Ohh... That's what that was.
Off topic (sort of)- I can just imagine aqwut rolling up to one of these races with a GST on 24S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supermaxx
Offline
Posts: 2,031
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth
|
01.05.2009, 10:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BL_RV0
Ohh... That's what that was.
Off topic (sort of)- I can just imagine aqwut rolling up to one of these races with a GST on 24S. 
|
That would be fun to watch   .
Castle Neu 1520 on 6S LiPo Powered Gmaxx (Nitro Killer)
Predator with OS .21TM
Supermaxx with Mach .26
Revo with OS .18TZ
Kyosho ST-RR Conversion
Ofna CR with Tekin ESC/Motor (2)
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
 |