 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
Goin' Dual Mamba Max 6900 in E-Maxx -
05.21.2007, 07:48 PM
Will have this project finished in a few days as soon as second Mamba 6900 system comes in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
05.21.2007, 11:14 PM
That does sound cool, but why? A single XL can motor will do the same thing, if not more on less juice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
05.21.2007, 11:54 PM
Y not?:)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless!
Offline
Posts: 950
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Corona, Ca.
|
05.22.2007, 02:51 AM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gandalff
Y not?:)
|
If your racing or just bashing, single is the better route to go. But if you've got no budget and are looking for a fun project to rip up and down the street with, then go duallies! Lot's of torque! Just make sure your whole drivetrain is beefed up. Keep us updated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
05.22.2007, 01:16 AM
Welcome to the forum!
because a single XL motor is cheaper, stronger and more efficient.
Nice Tonka you've got there..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
05.22.2007, 08:27 AM
one single XL will outpreform a dual 6900 Johnny!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Mod
Offline
Posts: 2,487
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
05.22.2007, 09:06 AM
Yeah, and will be cheaper and lighter too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless!
Offline
Posts: 950
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Corona, Ca.
|
05.22.2007, 03:41 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Serum
one single XL will outpreform a dual 6900 Johnny!
|
Agreed, he should have gone dual XL's.:027:
Procharged, I've never had any "sync" issues with my dual XL's or dual 9L's. Smooth as butta. :027:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Titanium
Offline
Posts: 1,729
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL Area
|
05.22.2007, 03:46 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JOHNNYMAXXIMA
Agreed, he should have gone dual XL's.:027:
Procharged, I've never had any "sync" issues with my dual XL's or dual 9L's. Smooth as butta. :027:
|
Good to know!
When I suggested dual Mamba Max 4600's for my Supermaxx I received numerous "Don't do it" responses from the RC-Monster Collective, so I went for the NEU1515/Mamba Max.
That's why I was raising the red flag.
I gues it's not a problem, so ... nevermind! :010:
Supermaxx-Racer-X, VBS, FLM chassis & Transcase, HSR Motorsports Slipper, Cage, MMM ESC, NEU1515. REVO 3.3, BL X1-CRT, CRT, BL-CRT.5, Procharged '92 Mustang visit www.chitownrc.com and www.rcbros.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Titanium
Offline
Posts: 1,729
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL Area
|
05.22.2007, 10:03 AM
Welcome Gandalff!
Hope the two "sync" well for you. That would be my major concern. Two motors fighting each other would be hard on equipment & run times.
Supermaxx-Racer-X, VBS, FLM chassis & Transcase, HSR Motorsports Slipper, Cage, MMM ESC, NEU1515. REVO 3.3, BL X1-CRT, CRT, BL-CRT.5, Procharged '92 Mustang visit www.chitownrc.com and www.rcbros.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
05.22.2007, 10:24 AM
With two controllers you don't need to worry about being out of sync Barry. Unless they are turning in opposite directions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Titanium
Offline
Posts: 1,729
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL Area
|
05.22.2007, 10:57 AM
Are you sure serum? Both controllers would need exactly the same programming files at a minimum or they would in fact "fight" each other even if only minimally.
Supermaxx-Racer-X, VBS, FLM chassis & Transcase, HSR Motorsports Slipper, Cage, MMM ESC, NEU1515. REVO 3.3, BL X1-CRT, CRT, BL-CRT.5, Procharged '92 Mustang visit www.chitownrc.com and www.rcbros.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Mod
Offline
Posts: 2,487
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
05.22.2007, 11:04 AM
Same programming goes without saying.
Opposite directions would be an interesting experiment :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
05.22.2007, 11:04 AM
It's a rather smooth motion, the turning; one low RPMs it might affect on or the other, but it's not as essential to have a perfect timing as with 2 motors on 1 controllers. The MM (or any brushless controller suited for our applications) uses software that enables it to turn from a minimal amount of RPM's. The MM is the slowest turning esc i know. still more than a ~120rpm start though. (guess)
They are not fighting eachother, since you have got inertia from the magnet. They are not endless fast in response to the magnetic field that powers the rotor.
Last edited by Serum; 05.22.2007 at 11:08 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
05.22.2007, 11:08 AM
I'll get the camera Daf.. Hang on..
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
 |