RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Castle Creations

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#16)
Sammus
RC-Monster Titanium
 
Sammus's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,161
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All over Australia.
09.08.2008, 12:14 AM

I think thats one way of looking at it. More winds = longer length of wire = more resistance = less current at a given voltage. I think that isn't really valid thought because in an electric motor there are other influences from the rotating magnetic field etc, so the resistance of the winds dont follow ohms law like that.

The way I look at it (which could well be wrong) is that firstly, more current = more heat. Then recalling some high school physics classes, reason the following: Say to you want the power to wheelie at a given speed, that comes down to requiring a certain amount of torque at a certain rpm. To attain that torque you need to draw a certain amount of current.. (torque is proportional to current through the winds).

Torque is also proportional to the number of winds, so with more winds, you need higher V to get to your rpm, but you dont draw as much current = less heat.

Last edited by Sammus; 09.08.2008 at 12:18 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#17)
hemiblas
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
hemiblas's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 433
Join Date: Oct 2007
09.08.2008, 11:07 PM

Ok, I think I get it now. The heat generated from within the motor is the current running through the winds to create the magnetic field. So a 10XL on 6S not only runs the speed controller cooler, but the motor runs cooler as well. So an 8XL geared up really wont give less heat than a 7xl geared down if you are running the same voltage because the current will be approximately the same.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#18)
hemiblas
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
hemiblas's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 433
Join Date: Oct 2007
09.09.2008, 09:37 PM

Looks like mine gave out on the second run. I will join the ranks of those returning their controllers.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19)
e-mikey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
09.09.2008, 10:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffEmbracedDC View Post
Were there any actual changes between the 1st and 2nd batches of the V2?

-Jeff

None.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#20)
Sammus
RC-Monster Titanium
 
Sammus's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,161
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All over Australia.
09.09.2008, 10:58 PM

How do you know? Can't just claim that with no evidence...
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#21)
e-mikey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
09.09.2008, 11:45 PM

Well I no "evidence" but when I was on the phone with Thomas (from Castle) I had asked him if there were any changes, he said no.

Also, you can kind of tell that Castle doesn't know why it's happening, and they can't fix it if they don't know what to fix.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#22)
Sammus
RC-Monster Titanium
 
Sammus's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,161
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All over Australia.
09.09.2008, 11:50 PM

Thomas told me that under any circumstances the HV110 phoenix controller should never be used for land vehicles - but I've read a million people (even patrick or joe i think) on here say they work fine.

But yeah, I reckon there is probably no difference, but you can't say there isn't. After all, there is plenty of differences between V1 and V2, but seemingly no difference in how many failures there are, one could say that means they didnt change anything, but they did - they just didnt fix the problem :P
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com