RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
lincpimp
Check out my huge box!
 
lincpimp's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
09.25.2007, 09:34 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeropointbug View Post
http://www.greathobbies.com/producti...d_id=EFLM4060A

OR

http://www.greathobbies.com/producti...d_id=EFLM4046A

Those are 50mm cans, and the Power 60 does 1200 watts continuous. It weights the same as an XL motor. 380 grams You can also take the shaft out, and make a custom one, or whatever.
Thanks for the links ZPB (can I call you buggie?)

The 46 size 670 kv looks interesting, The lower kv would let me put larger tires back on it and have more torque for startup. Do you think that the quark 65 would be ablee to handle that motor? Plus I would need to step up to better batteries, I have a pair of 20c 5000 2s lipos to run. And my motor mount would have to be remade to accomodate the larger can size. I will see about finding one of these motors and change up my setup.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
09.25.2007, 10:57 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by lincpimp View Post
Thanks for the links ZPB (can I call you buggie?)

The 46 size 670 kv looks interesting, The lower kv would let me put larger tires back on it and have more torque for startup. Do you think that the quark 65 would be ablee to handle that motor? Plus I would need to step up to better batteries, I have a pair of 20c 5000 2s lipos to run. And my motor mount would have to be remade to accomodate the larger can size. I will see about finding one of these motors and change up my setup.
Call me buggie? lol sure....

I am not sure if the Quark 65 would handle it. What kind of speed would that get you with 670kv? That is what you need to know.

Now I am curious about running one of these in my Revo... I am gonna go do some calcs.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com