 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
(#1)
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,061
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks CA
|
01.08.2008, 10:25 PM
well im leaning toward the quark because it can handle 6s (if i ever decide to go 6s) and its only $125. i know how smooth the quarks are and i liek the free replacement! ill put a fan on it. (would a fan be enough? or would heatsinks be better?)
|
   |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#2)
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,061
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks CA
|
01.08.2008, 10:37 PM
heres that i got on the speed calc
Differential Ratio: 2.8461538461538462 Transmission Ratio: 1 Other Ratio: 1 Spur Tooth Count: 46 Pinion Tooth Count: 14 Total Voltage: 14.8 Motor KV: 1770 Tire Diameter (inches): 5.5 Tire Ballooning (inches): 0 Motor Current Draw: 0 Motor coil Ω: 0 Spur/Pinion Ratio: 3.29 : 1 Total Ratio: 9.35165 : 1 Tire Circumference (inches): 17.28 inches (438.88mm) Total Motor Speed: 26196 RPM Vehicle Speed: 45.83 MPH (73.63km/h) Effective Speed Rate: 3.1mph/V (4.97kmh/V) Effective KV Value: 1770 Motor Torque: Amperage not specified... Final Torque: Amperage not specified... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
