 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Something, anything, nothing
Offline
Posts: 2,747
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
05.03.2008, 10:47 PM
because roar does more to hold the hobby back than help it progress.
Thankfully, most people out there don't race in roar sanctioned classes if they even race at all. Most of the hobby is made up of bashers anyway. I could care less if the motors are roar compliant or not. Most of what I run or am interested in running is not roar compliant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon FIBRE NOT FIBER!
Offline
Posts: 701
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
05.03.2008, 11:06 PM
the lipo issue is relivant, but banning senosrless and the like seems as if novak paid them well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check out my huge box!
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
|
05.03.2008, 11:10 PM
I can't blame them, can you imagine trying to drive a powerful sensorless setup? With the improvements in lipo that are coming, a really powerful car could be built. But racing is usually trying to get the cars similar, so that driver skill is what is competing, not who has the most powerful car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon FIBRE NOT FIBER!
Offline
Posts: 701
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
05.03.2008, 11:41 PM
true. but you DO (proven fact) go faster with a less powerful car that can be controlled rather than some stupidly high powered setup that spends most of its time outside the fastest line. ill leave it at this, dont care for a big thread in the wrong thread!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check out my huge box!
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
|
05.03.2008, 11:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tc3_racer_001
true. but you DO (proven fact) go faster with a less powerful car that can be controlled rather than some stupidly high powered setup that spends most of its time outside the fastest line. ill leave it at this, dont care for a big thread in the wrong thread!
|
This is true, only so much power can be handled by the current crop of electric on road cars. Imagine if 1/8 scale electric on road became popular! I can easily see some big power systems, and expansive tracks too. Current 10th cars are only good for a certain size track and that is what the current selection of roar legal stuff caters to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon FIBRE NOT FIBER!
Offline
Posts: 701
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
05.03.2008, 11:49 PM
theres one that was built in brisbane and the vid on youtube makes it look slow. its scary fast and if it hit someone, expect at least a week in hospital. I was talking to one of the guys in the vid who was mashalling and he reconed that if such a class existed he would refuse to marshal, just becuase u cant hear them coming... and for draining 3 high capacity lipos in less than 6 minutes... well... i can think of more fun things to do with the hr or so waiting for them to recharge!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 229
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rockport, TX
|
05.04.2008, 01:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tc3_racer_001
the lipo issue is relivant, but banning senosrless and the like seems as if novak paid them well...
|
Not sure what you're referring to - but Roar has not banned sensorless systems. Sensorless motors and controllers are completely roar legal assuming they fall in to their other restrictions (rotor diameter, solder points, company name stamped on endbell, and most of all, rebuildable).
I'd be surprised if they came out with any "pro" 1/10th motors unless you considered castle-style neu 1509/1506 motors to fit that category. Though, who knows.
BL 8ight, BL FT B44, BL FT TC4, BL FT T4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like chocolate milk
Offline
Posts: 650
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Houston, TX
|
05.04.2008, 01:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffEmbracedDC
and most of all, rebuildable
|
Yeah, because after 10,000 hours of running, I'm going to need some new bearings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 229
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rockport, TX
|
05.04.2008, 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleebus.jones
Yeah, because after 10,000 hours of running, I'm going to need some new bearings. 
|
haha. Go brushless. Still, though... If you're serving your motor any kind of justice it's bound to get a little dirty once in a while. It''s nice to be able to flush any grime and extra oil away.
-Jeff
BL 8ight, BL FT B44, BL FT TC4, BL FT T4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 219
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France
|
05.06.2008, 06:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffEmbracedDC
Not sure what you're referring to - but Roar has not banned sensorless systems. Sensorless motors and controllers are completely roar legal assuming they fall in to their other restrictions (rotor diameter, solder points, company name stamped on endbell, and most of all, rebuildable).
I'd be surprised if they came out with any "pro" 1/10th motors unless you considered castle-style neu 1509/1506 motors to fit that category. Though, who knows.
|
wrong, for example Tekin motor are rebuildable, with solde tabs and engraved endbell, they still failed ROAR approval why ?
They are delta wound,
ROAR legal motor must be Y wound motor, which is obviously more difficult to drive sensorless :/ ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Titanium
Offline
Posts: 1,161
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All over Australia.
|
05.06.2008, 07:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister-T
ROAR legal motor must be Y wound motor, which is obviously more difficult to drive sensorless :/ ...
|
Why is Y obviously more difficult to drive sensorless?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
05.06.2008, 09:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister-T
wrong, for example Tekin motor are rebuildable, with solde tabs and engraved endbell, they still failed ROAR approval why ?
They are delta wound,
ROAR legal motor must be Y wound motor, which is obviously more difficult to drive sensorless :/ ...
|
You guys want to know a strange thing and why I don't like ROAR at all. The Trinity N60 and N40 are both Feigaos 380C and they seem to be Delta wound and they both are approved by ROAR. ROAR to me is like the FIA, but ROAR board seems to be getting their hands wet $$$$$$$ if you kow what I mean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 3,794
Join Date: May 2005
Location: georgia
|
05.06.2008, 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lutach
You guys want to know a strange thing and why I don't like ROAR at all. The Trinity N60 and N40 are both Feigaos 380C and they seem to be Delta wound and they both are approved by ROAR. ROAR to me is like the FIA, but ROAR board seems to be getting their hands wet $$$$$$$ if you kow what I mean.
|
Thats quite a claim, If its true, thats a heck of a conspiracy towards other brushless manufacturers. Because its in the rules that Y winds are the only ones legal.
I just checked the roar rules and trinity, the only brushless motors trinity is saying are legal are the duo 10.5 and 17.5 motors
Work because i gotta, play because i wanna
People here hate Nitro, I love it. I start it, run it about 50 ft from me and it dies, I go after it. Perfect exercise
Last edited by crazyjr; 05.06.2008 at 01:16 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
05.06.2008, 01:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyjr
Thats quite a claim, If its true, thats a heck of a conspiracy towards other brushless manufacturers. Because its in the rules that Y winds are the only ones legal.
I just checked the roar rules and trinity, the only brushless motors trinity is saying are legal are the duo 10.5 and 17.5 motors
|
Look at the bottom and it says they are ROAR legal http://www.superiorhobbies.com/istar...&id=TRI0201!SH.
I opened my Feigao 380C http://www.rc-monster.com/proddetail...AO_380C&cat=20 and my Trinity N60 and they look the same. You guys be the judge. I can't find my camera and once I do I'll show you guys the inside of both.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
05.06.2008, 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister-T
wrong, for example Tekin motor are rebuildable, with solde tabs and engraved endbell, they still failed ROAR approval why ?
They are delta wound,
ROAR legal motor must be Y wound motor, which is obviously more difficult to drive sensorless :/ ...
|
Rotor is probably too big and MOST of the redline motors are probably delta wound (since most, but not all, are whole turns and do not have "half turns"). There's a few things that need to be met.
This is why I don't race... Too much politics and BS.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
 |