|
06.03.2009, 10:29 AM
This whole discussion is just ridiculous from what I see. I haven't read this whole thread, just pieces of it (as it rather long now), but it really just smacks of CC trying to find something to blame for the early failures of their MMM units. Zippy's being low cost are pretty popular out there and they saw a few failures on the Zippys and bingo. An easy scape goat.
I run many different kinds of packs including zippy 20-30c, zippy flightmax 30c, Neuenergy 30C and 25C, Enerland PQ 25c and 30C, etc... AND I have had many MMM die on me. I prefer not to state the number of replacement that CC has sent me. (Its actually pretty ridiculous.) But now I finally have 3 units that have proven to be reilable. Nothing else has changed in the setups, just the MMM units and these 3 are now lasting. It just ook going through a ton of MMM units that weren't up to snuff to finally find 3 that were.
To be fair, I only had one MMM fail violently. and it wasnt when I was running the zippy packs. The rest were all quiet deaths or small poofs of smoke and dead.
I seriously think this thread is blown WAY out of proportion. And dont get me wrong. I think CC is a great company and makes some really good stuff. But the early MMM units were not a good example of CC's best work.
I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...
Silent...But Deadly
|