RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > RC-Monster Area > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
09.25.2009, 07:56 PM

Amir D. Aczel is the author.

The interesting thing about Quantum Mechanics is you can't disprove nor prove it really, it just is what it is. It is always expanding, it is an open science, always learning new "situations" as it were in the quantum world (and why can't it apply to the macro?). Of course it is not perfect, as we are not at the point where we can say we know the universe (far from it actually), as the more we know, the more we realize we don't know, until we come to a point, whenever that point may be. If you haven't already, read the book Entanglement, or similar, it will literally take your breath away.

I would not say Quantum Theory is liken to Religion, one is based on the understanding of events/experiments/observations, and the later is based on, well, nothing really, superstition at best.

Quantum Mechanics opens the door is what it does, I think it is at least pointing us in the right direction. Like you said, you just have to keep an open mind, which religion has the effect of 'mind box', living in a box in the mind, where this is what is, and that is the way it is.

And E does not equal MC^2... even when I was a child I never agreed with it; Nikola Tesla reaffirmed that for me later on. Many physicists now are leaning away from relativity and to the 'new' sciences, as now we are designing our technology on the theories of ancient Even Einstein himself at the end of his days became a sort of 'mystic', going back to the idea that there is 'something else', a god force as it were(along with other QM physicists). His colleagues and followers kept it going and the money changers (Morgans, Rothchilds, etc.) funded that type of science, as the direction Tesla was going with Zeropoint Energy was obviously unprofitable for them.

Also, I think TexasSP is misinterpreting the message I am trying to portray, maybe he now knows what I mean?


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com