Quote:
Originally Posted by kraegar
Sounds like WINS then, yeah. Damned WINS, who ever thought that was a good idea I don't know.
And yeah, static with a simple host entry is the way to go in the long run. (Or, what I do is dhcp with a reservation, and have my router acting as a local name server)
|
I'm not a network guy, so just this basic stuff was giving me a headache. About WINS; all I know is that I've heard of it.
Your solution for having the router act as a name server is ideal as I don't need to go around editing hosts files, but I don't believe my router has that ability.
Actually, my router solution consists of two routers. Router 1 is a wired router with 4 port switch. I like the router function of that one better, so it serves as the DHCP server/router. The other router is a wireless one also with a 4 port switch. I simply disabled DHCP in that one, uplinked it to the wired router. So, it's really just an access point/daisy-chained switch. Plus, 4 ports wasn't enough, so it gives me 7 total (one is being used on the uplink). Yeah, I could have just gotten a single wireless router with more wired ports, but I already had the wired one, so it was cheaper to do it this way.