 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
(#1)
|
|
Guelph, Canada, eh!
Offline
Posts: 1,083
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
|
10.25.2010, 07:35 PM
Mr. Wilcox, have you familiarized yourself with this site and it's people before coming here? This graph is ridiculous. Please stop insulting the intelligence of the well informed people in this forum and give them real proof, real data, real test results.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#2)
|
|
|
Can't catch this...
Offline
Posts: 1,142
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: baraboo, WI
|
10.25.2010, 07:59 PM
Quote:
NM, didn't see the paintshop pic... edit: if that is a accurate graph, your only getting 4800mah out of a big @$$ brick of a pack... at only 1\20 of the C rating... sooo... 6500-4800= 1700mah was lost as heat... did the pack come off at 100*+??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
