MaxAmps Race Edition Lipos

[Arct1k]

Originally Posted by Finnster

I think the only graphs we will ever see is how big a cock you are for buying these batts.

I've already posted charts from use in the Baja...

I can take some more next time I run...

[lincpimp]

Originally Posted by Arct1k

I've already posted charts from use in the Baja...

I can take some more next time I run...

Did you see 3.5v per cell at 150c discharge?

Of if you like just post the amp draw you did at 3.5v per cell.

If you post graphs and the answer to my last question we can all go on with our lives, and forget about MA.

[Finnster]

Originally Posted by Arct1k

I've already posted charts from use in the Baja...

I can take some more next time I run...

Don't mean to cause offense my friend, so let me give a very serious response to my unserious post.

Its important to note that the Cockometer is a highly sensitive multi-variable true tri-beam analyzer whose sealed and quartz-coated high-throughput optics and Dual Diode Detector/Single Monochromator (DDD/SM) is capable of real-time operation, which ensures consistent performance and provides the best possible stability and allows references to be measured and corrected parallel to data collection.

This is not to be confused with previous instruments with a single detection complier which could only analyze for unidimentional cockery, let alone reference compensation and real-time error correction. Thus many false positives and unfair associations with fop-headed dundercocks.

Using the DDD/SM technology of the Cockometer, the instrument can quickly and automatically compensate for other variables, such as price paid, vehicle installed, mod multiplier, and other variables, such as the negative log of baddassness.

While we could go thru the trouble of installing the QuikCock v2.11 remote diagnosis software on your PC (so you could simply hold up the baja upto the webcam of said PC allowing off-site analysis and batch result reporting via email) a simple desk estimation analysis would be easy.

Baja:
MA 150C installed: +9 CU (extra CU penalty for showing it in a national rc mag, altho offset by what I'm sure was a low to negliable purchase price)
Chassis score: -3 CU
Mod multiplier: -5.7 (CC bl conversion scores high in this)
HV score booster: -3 CU
-log (Baddass): -5 CU

Overall score would be -7.7 cockunits. A very respectful score, and not far from perfect baddassery.

For comparison, a more typical setup:

Savage Flux 2350:
MA 150C-Full retail price: +11CU (+13 CU if you bought @ 15% MA frequent customer discount and thought you got a good deal)
Chassis score: +2 CU
Mod Mult.: +3 CU (none to simple rpm bumpers)
HV Score: +3 CU (4S only)
-log (badass): -1.1 CU

Overall: 17.9-19.9 CU. A devastating score and wonton display of pure cockery. If this vehicle was photographed with a $5 monochrome paintjob, submitted to an international RC mag and featured in the Reader Rides section, you will overload and fry the delicate photodiode array of the cockometer and be brandished an outlaw and marauder of all common sense and taste.

Sry for the long post, but some vital information for due consideration.

Oh no.. not this thread again...

Originally Posted by Cody.McP

Oh no.. not this thread again...

This thread has never been better.