 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Aluminum
Offline
Posts: 704
Join Date: May 2008
|
12.19.2011, 02:27 AM
Nah mate I got my Castle Link card..
But seriously if you can afford a $1099 rc car, you can afford an Ipod Touch to use the software, not to get into this Iphone vs Android thing, but I have an Iphone and an Android Tablet, and for the 'non computer nerd' amongst us, the Apple is a lot more user friendly so I can see why that platform was used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Check out my huge box!
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
|
12.19.2011, 12:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastbaja5b
the Apple is a lot more user friendly so I can see why that platform was used.
|
The reason they used the itouch iphone is that the plug on the bottom is the same on both products. No other smart products have matching plugs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Aluminum
Offline
Posts: 897
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Same town as "Brand P"
|
12.19.2011, 03:50 PM
all android phones have the same plug. Plug location may differ, but that would not be an issue if they could design the radio with a 3 or 4inch pigtail to plug into the phone.
Built Ford tough, with Chevy stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
12.19.2011, 04:15 PM
Could be the connector thing. The iDevice snaps into place with no "wires" to mess with. Adding a cable would just be a point of failure. But really, I think the reason it more to do with app consistency. How many Android devices are out there that won't run this or that app because of some incompatibility? Sure, most app devs release patches, but with the iDevice, there are MUCH fewer devices to worry about.
Either way, no matter if it was Android, BlackBerry, Windows, etc; the issue I have is the purposeful crippling of the system without the added device. It's not about added cost, it's not about requiring Apple specifically. And I've made my opinion clear about this system if the reasoning is to mitigate liability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Stock
Offline
Posts: 49
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
12.29.2011, 05:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG
Either way, no matter if it was Android, BlackBerry, Windows, etc; the issue I have is the purposeful crippling of the system without the added device. It's not about added cost, it's not about requiring Apple specifically. And I've made my opinion clear about this system if the reasoning is to mitigate liability.
|
lol... where have you been for the past 15 years? Intel & AMD have been doing this since almost forever. For a very long time now all their CPUs are the same chip, with the lower spec ones being crippled versions of their more powerful counterparts.
At least Trx allows you to un-cripple the product without doing a hack job on it ;)
A lot of car manufactures are the same. They detune engines in the ecu for specific markets. eg Audi TTS, S3, VW Golf R, GTi etc etc..
EDIT: I guess I understand your POV, it's more about the advertising of the product. Other companies don't advertise the potential of their products and then go on to say that you need to pay extra to realise the full potential (some do but not many). In the case of CPU mfgs, they just advertise the non / lesser crippled units as something totally different and make you pay for it. So at the end of the day, it just a matter of marketing perception.
Last edited by littlejohn; 12.29.2011 at 05:44 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Titanium
Offline
Posts: 1,609
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bozeman, Montana
|
12.30.2011, 11:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by littlejohn
lol... where have you been for the past 15 years? Intel & AMD have been doing this since almost forever. For a very long time now all their CPUs are the same chip, with the lower spec ones being crippled versions of their more powerful counterparts.
At least Trx allows you to un-cripple the product without doing a hack job on it ;)
A lot of car manufactures are the same. They detune engines in the ecu for specific markets. eg Audi TTS, S3, VW Golf R, GTi etc etc..
EDIT: I guess I understand your POV, it's more about the advertising of the product. Other companies don't advertise the potential of their products and then go on to say that you need to pay extra to realise the full potential (some do but not many). In the case of CPU mfgs, they just advertise the non / lesser crippled units as something totally different and make you pay for it. So at the end of the day, it just a matter of marketing perception.
|
A lot of de-tuned computer hardware is made from chips that don't pass QC for a higher-rated device. Take the GeForce 6800 Ultra/GT/GS for example. The best chips went into the Ultra and had the highest clock rates. The GT was a great card in its day, but the Ultra could still be overclocked farther before destabilizing. I had a GT flashed to Ultra firmware and overclocked past Ultra stock settings, but any true Ultra would go to higher clock speeds before destabilizing. The GS was basically a GT with 4 pixel rendering pipelines and a shader disabled, some could be succesfully unlocked and some had issues when unlocked. Those would normally have been thrown out but instead they locked out the defective parts and sold the parts at a discounted price. That kind of locking is OK because you're getting a good deal on something that would normally have been thrown out, and it still performed really well. Once my GT burned up I got a GS to replace it and it unlocked just fine, awesome. Burned the GS up and got another one on warranty, that one wouldn't unlock without artifacting but it was nowhere near the cost of the GT.
Most modern cars come tuned to deliver about ~70-80% of what they're capable of for a number of reasons. They can sacrifice power in favor of fuel economy, in some cases change the tax or insurance classifications for a car, keep idiots from blowing their engines and blaming the manufacturer, there's a ton of different things. It's not about making someone buy a tune or anything, it's about making it last longer, cost less, etc.
I agree with the marketing, if it's going to be 100+ capable then they should specify that. When I got my mini Revo it said on the box what it would do out of the box and what it would do if I changed the gearing and put a bigger battery in it. Then again, when I bought my 3.3 Nitro 4-Tec I just broke in the engine and hit the throttle. 0-60 in ~3.5 seconds according to TRX and with some porting of the engine and taller gears it'd do 80+ but the 4-Tec has never come limited...
All I ever wanted was an honest weeks pay for an honest days work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Aluminum
Offline
Posts: 897
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Same town as "Brand P"
|
12.19.2011, 05:14 PM
If its about liability then the purchaser could just sign a waiver at the time of purchase, or if bought online maybe a "i agree to the terms of use" checkbox in order to proceed to checkout. My beef is not the use of an apple product, but the fact it is advertised on the box to go 100mph, but in order to actually go that fast you need an ipod. Seems kind of exclusive to me. Sure I could go buy a used ipod touch for around 150 off of craigslist, but I just paid a grand for a toy car that wont perform as advertised and now im broke, and to top it off my wife is pissed off because she found out i spent a grand on said toy car.
Built Ford tough, with Chevy stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
12.20.2011, 06:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh9mille
If its about liability then the purchaser could just sign a waiver at the time of purchase, or if bought online maybe a "i agree to the terms of use" checkbox in order to proceed to checkout. My beef is not the use of an apple product, but the fact it is advertised on the box to go 100mph, but in order to actually go that fast you need an ipod. Seems kind of exclusive to me. Sure I could go buy a used ipod touch for around 150 off of craigslist, but I just paid a grand for a toy car that wont perform as advertised and now im broke, and to top it off my wife is pissed off because she found out i spent a grand on said toy car. 
|
Chances are good that anyone buying this car, has a friend who has a iOS device. You only need to download the app and unlock the ESC once. After that you have full use of the car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Aluminum
Offline
Posts: 897
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Same town as "Brand P"
|
12.20.2011, 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarstenL
Chances are good that anyone buying this car, has a friend who has a iOS device. You only need to download the app and unlock the ESC once. After that you have full use of the car.
|
The point is, is that nobody should have to borrow/buy/use any device to use the car as advetised on the box.
Built Ford tough, with Chevy stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Inane
Offline
Posts: 59
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
12.20.2011, 06:37 PM
Bryan, Thanks, we don't take it personally, I just find such a wast of time and server space. If you have a complaint, do it somewhere where it might do some good.
Bernie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
12.19.2011, 05:16 PM
I think even a waiver is not going to work. See my previous thoughts on this in case you missed it:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG
To be blunt, the lawsuit/liability thing is just bull****. This whole hobby is a lawsuit waiting to happen; you have lipos that can burn your house down if you don't treat them right, gears that can chomp a finger if you are stupid enough to go near them while it's running, voltages that can harm you (for HV people), currents that can generate enough heat to burn, and so on. And really, a ~10lb vehicle will hurt just as much doing 70mph into your ankle as 100mph. Idiots will get hurt and hurt others no matter what you do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Inane
Offline
Posts: 59
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
12.20.2011, 05:49 PM
The iPhone lock is a Traxxas 'feature' and not something Castle Creations has anything to do with. It would be more appropriate to voice your concerns on the Traxxas website. You will need to approach Traxxas on this, not Castle Creations.
Bernie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
12.20.2011, 05:56 PM
Bernie, I think we all know that CC has no say on this, and that it's a Traxxas "feature". So, please don't think these comments are against you guys. And some have voiced our concerns at the Traxxas website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Skool
Offline
Posts: 7,494
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Devon, England
|
12.20.2011, 08:46 PM
^No point complaining on the traxxas forum then- they'd just accuse you of traxxas bashing & ban you
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
 |