RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > General Electric

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
jhautz
RC-Monster Mod
 
jhautz's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,217
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
08.14.2006, 09:10 PM

c-gates

I'm running a 9xl and the Quark125 on the 8000mah Truerc cells right now. I have (2) 3s packs and (2) 2s packs. I have run it in both the 5s config and the 6s config and can tell you for sure that it runs much better on 5s. With 6s the Quark gets this very pronounced cogging that is much worse when you first start running, but seems to get less as it warms up. I run basically only in 5s anyway, the 6s just heats the motor up way to much. And besides that, the power is to uncontrolable on 6s and I just wound up breaking things in the drivetrain way to quickly.

BTW: I would go for the 3s and 2s pack configuration if you are running the g-maxx chassis. You won't be able to fit the 5s pack in the g-maxx. The 3s pack barely fits... Plus if you go with the 2 pack (3s + 2s) configuration you can get a second set and run in either 5s or 6s if you want. Not to mention you have better weight balance with the packs split.

Last thing... You don't need the 20-30C packs. The TrueRc 8000mah packs never even get warm. Buying the higher end pack will not gain you anything.


Edit: Forget the g-maxx issue I mentioned above. I just read that its a LSP (T?) But 2s+3s will still give you flexibility.


I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...


Silent...But Deadly



Last edited by jhautz; 08.14.2006 at 09:13 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
squeeforever
RC-Monster Mod
 
squeeforever's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 6,254
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baton Rouge
08.14.2006, 10:08 PM

Quote:
Edit: Forget the g-maxx issue I mentioned above. I just read that its a LSP (T?) But 2s+3s will still give you flexibility.
LSP is Lightning Stadium Pro. A truggy by Hot Bodies.
  Send a message via AIM to squeeforever  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
cemetery gates
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
08.16.2006, 09:48 PM

well i am going with the trueRC packs. i am going to get the single 5s 8000 pack or a single 6s 8000 pack. i run 16 cells now, would 5s compare to 16 cells? i would go with 6s but i am afraid that my controller would not handle it. should i risk it with 6s or stay safe with 5s:032: .......
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
jhautz
RC-Monster Mod
 
jhautz's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,217
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
08.16.2006, 09:55 PM

IMO.... 5s

Its never a good idea to plan on running your equipment at its limit every time. The occasional 6s run would not be an issue, but to run it there every run, would just be asking for issues in my mind.


I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...


Silent...But Deadly


   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
cemetery gates
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
08.16.2006, 10:32 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhautz
IMO.... 5s

Its never a good idea to plan on running your equipment at its limit every time. The occasional 6s run would not be an issue, but to run it there every run, would just be asking for issues in my mind.
you are right. i really really want to know how 5s compares to 16 cells.

argg... i want 5.5s lipos :005: :005: ...........
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
BrianG
RC-Monster Admin
 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
08.17.2006, 12:57 AM

IMO, it somewhat depends on what 5s Lipo and what 16 cell NiMH packs you are comparing. Some packs hold a higher voltage under load than others. Generally, lipos with higher capacities and C ratings will hold the voltage higher under load. Of course, the packaging gets bigger because you are paralleling cells to get that capacity. Each parallel cell is taking only part of the full load. However, popular opinion seems to hold that higher capacity NiMH cells don't quite have the deep deep discharge capability. This is probably due to the fact that the manufacturers are squeezing more capacity in the same physical size (or very close to it) sub-C cell. Something has to give when you do that, even counting technological advancements.

Ideally, a 5s pack is at 18.5v assuming a 3.7v nominal voltage per cell. 16 NiMH cells will be at 19.2v assuming a 1.2v nominal voltage. Lets say you draw 100A. If the Lipo packs is an 8Ah pack rated for 20c (160A), it will probably hold a higher voltage than a NiMH pack at that current since the NiMH will be closer to its max ratings. If that lipo pack drops to 3.5v/cell at 100A, the pack voltage will be 17.5v. If each NiMH cell drops to 1v/cell at 100A, the pack will only be at 16v.
  Send a message via Yahoo to BrianG Send a message via MSN to BrianG  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
jhautz
RC-Monster Mod
 
jhautz's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,217
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
08.17.2006, 01:23 AM

yea..... what he said.....


Actually, I do think you are right on the money with that thought.


I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...


Silent...But Deadly


   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com