RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
Takedown
WARNING: May become violent.
 
Takedown's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,426
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wisconsin
02.12.2008, 10:09 AM

I wouldnt even try it. Outrunner motors demand alot from the ESC thats powering it. I would go for a quark or a MM instead.
  Send a message via AIM to Takedown  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
skellyo
RC-Monster Brushless
 
skellyo's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,466
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
02.12.2008, 12:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Takedown View Post
I wouldnt even try it. Outrunner motors demand alot from the ESC thats powering it. I would go for a quark or a MM instead.
That's not really true. Most outrunners are quite easy to run in terms if current consumption.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
lincpimp
Check out my huge box!
 
lincpimp's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
02.12.2008, 01:32 PM

Outrunners only cause issues with some escs, and that is generally the startup programming. I ran an align 430l in a 10th scale carwith a quark 33 and it worked fine. The mamba 25 is a good esc, and the sidewinder seems to be a good esc too. JRH has tested it with a variety of outrunners, if memory serves correctly. It really depends on vehicle weight and gearing. Plus if you want to run 4s lipo, you will need to disable the internal bec and run an external bec or receiver pack.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com