 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Aluminum
Offline
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
06.07.2008, 11:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pdelcast
Well, the main problem we had with all of our Copper heatsink testing was that the heatsink is HEAVY -- and on crashes would sometimes rip the FETs off the board (or in half!) 
The copper heat sinks did work very well, but were very expensive.
On Semiconductor has done some custom stuff for us in the past -- they might be willing to listen.
|
There are ways to solve this, fet's case cannot support such load. Expensive way - hybrid heatsinks, all the way up to built-in heatpipes. Second one - pcb support for heatsink, you can solder heatsink to the board.
Well, now that is when we switch to PM.
By the way, I am pretty sure, you've seen that :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Titanium
Offline
Posts: 1,697
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
06.08.2008, 02:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GriffinRU
|
Sure is a lot easier to build a high power controller when you only have a single phase...
Probably just a couple Eupec IGBTs. Pretty simple. -- What isn't talked about is the RADIATOR that that controller requires -- and water pump, and plumbing... 2 watts of loss per amp just for forward drop, minimum.
IGBT drivers can be a challenge in three phase setups, but single phase is a breeze.
Patrick del Castillo
President, Principle Engineer
Castle Creations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JERRY2KONE SUPERMAXX
Offline
Posts: 3,452
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HAYMARKET VIRGINIA
|
Fresh -
06.08.2008, 03:13 AM
Even in the best think tanks having a fresh perspective is always a good thing. We all know how secretive any company can be about protecting its investment on any project, so seeing you (Patrick) discuss specs with a fellow R/C junkie who obviously has some insight is great. We have all heard Griffen spew technical stuff in an effort to improve things with ESC MFG and he has modded some MM's with impresive results. So maybe if you two get to share some fresh ideas we will benefit in the long run. Nice to see you communicating on this. Good luck guys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Titanium
Offline
Posts: 1,697
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
06.08.2008, 03:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GriffinRU
|
You know, I've been thinking about this --
It wouldn't be too hard to do a 400V MOSFET based 3 phase controller for an EV. And it wouldn't be hard to do a PM motor for it either (expensive magnets though...) Both ST and Infineon have some nice 500V MOSFETs now (that don't have 1000nC charges.)
Need to sleep now, but I'm thinking about it.
Patrick del Castillo
President, Principle Engineer
Castle Creations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Aluminum
Offline
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
06.08.2008, 08:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pdelcast
You know, I've been thinking about this --
It wouldn't be too hard to do a 400V MOSFET based 3 phase controller for an EV. And it wouldn't be hard to do a PM motor for it either (expensive magnets though...) Both ST and Infineon have some nice 500V MOSFETs now (that don't have 1000nC charges.)
Need to sleep now, but I'm thinking about it. 
|
Too bad we are far from each other,
I am less concern about cooling, can fix that.
If you can get me some ESC's already pre-fabbed with caps and tvs, I would like to share with you one more aspect of this tuning. I am sure you aware of that, but still. Pushing 30V fet's towards 6S is not great and we have seen more than one catastrophic fet's failure. What I was trying to add to MM, but didn't find a good place, is tvs per phase, not across H-bridge. 3 TVS total, no TVS across power leads required if caps are good and leads are short.
Concern - V=L*di/dt
With higher Kv motors, motors inductance and fast high current switching can exceed fet rating pretty quick. It would be the best to place clamp that would be before fet's diodes.
If you have any catastrophic fet's failures (I had one unit from DickyT) than it might be related to that.
Neu 1515 1.5D has about 2.3uH @ 50Amps and 1us it can hit 115V, your are not clamping phase - but just a thought.
Need to go, see you next weekend,
Last edited by GriffinRU; 06.08.2008 at 08:59 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Titanium
Offline
Posts: 1,697
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
06.08.2008, 11:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GriffinRU
Too bad we are far from each other,
I am less concern about cooling, can fix that.
If you can get me some ESC's already pre-fabbed with caps and tvs, I would like to share with you one more aspect of this tuning. I am sure you aware of that, but still. Pushing 30V fet's towards 6S is not great and we have seen more than one catastrophic fet's failure. What I was trying to add to MM, but didn't find a good place, is tvs per phase, not across H-bridge. 3 TVS total, no TVS across power leads required if caps are good and leads are short.
Concern - V=L*di/dt
With higher Kv motors, motors inductance and fast high current switching can exceed fet rating pretty quick. It would be the best to place clamp that would be before fet's diodes.
If you have any catastrophic fet's failures (I had one unit from DickyT) than it might be related to that.
Neu 1515 1.5D has about 2.3uH @ 50Amps and 1us it can hit 115V, your are not clamping phase - but just a thought.
Need to go, see you next weekend,
|
You'll find there are much better (faster and more robust) solutions than TVS.
Notice you never see those high voltages (115V) in a MMM or MM, because the body diodes clamp WAY before avalanche occurs. But there are several improvements that can be made beyond what the MMM has. First -- the body diodes do clamp to rail +- 1.5V or so, but they are slow. The snubbers are faster, but can't handle enough power -- bigger snubbers make a huge difference.
The whole idea is giving that energy a place to go that is LOW resistance path, not a high resistance path like a TVS. That energy of the inductor doesn't have to be wasted in a resistive part -- it can be recaptured, re-routed, restored.
Patrick del Castillo
President, Principle Engineer
Castle Creations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Aluminum
Offline
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
06.08.2008, 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pdelcast
You'll find there are much better (faster and more robust) solutions than TVS.
Notice you never see those high voltages (115V) in a MMM or MM, because the body diodes clamp WAY before avalanche occurs. But there are several improvements that can be made beyond what the MMM has. First -- the body diodes do clamp to rail +- 1.5V or so, but they are slow. The snubbers are faster, but can't handle enough power -- bigger snubbers make a huge difference.
The whole idea is giving that energy a place to go that is LOW resistance path, not a high resistance path like a TVS. That energy of the inductor doesn't have to be wasted in a resistive part -- it can be recaptured, re-routed, restored. 
|
That is where software comes to play...
Hundreds of ps are not that slow (it is possible to get faster devices but then substrate size (to maintain current capacity) will increase capacitance, thus slow you, limit you) , and there is no need to clamp all the way to zero, just to the safe Fet's level, and fet's are not that fast. But overtime both of them degradate, TVS first (easy to replace) fet second. Temp also change their response. Diodes are also rated to max Fet’s voltage, they are by-product of Fet. So you will exceed diode ratings if you do not clamp it earlier with something rated at higher voltage. You got the idea.
There is no much energy there to recuperate, but plenty to damage. Just switching fronts I am talking, nothing else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
06.08.2008, 02:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pdelcast
You know, I've been thinking about this --
It wouldn't be too hard to do a 400V MOSFET based 3 phase controller for an EV. And it wouldn't be hard to do a PM motor for it either (expensive magnets though...) Both ST and Infineon have some nice 500V MOSFETs now (that don't have 1000nC charges.)
Need to sleep now, but I'm thinking about it. 
|
What about Ixys for those High Voltage/High Power MOSFETs? I don't know how they compare with ST and Infineon, but most of the products offered by Ixys are on the higher voltage side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Titanium
Offline
Posts: 1,697
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
06.08.2008, 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lutach
What about Ixys for those High Voltage/High Power MOSFETs? I don't know how they compare with ST and Infineon, but most of the products offered by Ixys are on the higher voltage side.
|
Well, they do have some interesting parts -- but in the last few years they have really fallen behind the "big boys."
Fairchild also has some interesting high voltage parts, but is still a generation behind ST and Infineon in RDSon / die size.
Patrick del Castillo
President, Principle Engineer
Castle Creations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
06.08.2008, 04:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pdelcast
Well, they do have some interesting parts -- but in the last few years they have really fallen behind the "big boys."
Fairchild also has some interesting high voltage parts, but is still a generation behind ST and Infineon in RDSon / die size.
|
The last time I spoke with someone there, they told me they were the leader in High Volt/High Power MOSFETs. I'm pretty sure some of the MOSFETs manufacturers can make some sort of special MOSFET for the demands of us RC guys. Have you also thought about contacting the foundries that makes the silicon's that goes into a MOSFET to actually make one that better RDSon or what ever other special need you might have? A custom Castle MOSFET would be nice, kind of like the Futaba processor seen in their radios  .
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
 |