RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#16)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
08.25.2009, 02:38 AM

That's odd that you have better power with the Neu packs, what C rating were they?

After my race weekend, I noticed quite a bit better power down the straight with my 35C G3's compared to my other 25C Enerland packs. You can actually hear a difference as well, the motor sounds like it's spooling higher with the 35C's, screams.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#17)
BUSAFIED
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
08.25.2009, 03:07 AM

If I recall, the Neu packs were a 25c constant and a 50c burst.

I don't get it. I mean, the G3 had a little more oomph, but nothing impressive. In fact, the TP 40c/80c pack had more of a difference...and that's just 5c difference.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#18)
himalaya
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
himalaya's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 392
Join Date: Nov 2008
08.25.2009, 05:32 AM

The major difference between 25C and 35C G3s may be the packs' temps when you drive the truck back to pit.

Have a detailed look into the G3 datasheet, compare CX/VX of similar S and capacity, only those that have significant Ri difference are worth the extra $$ to update to 35C VX.


....What a Blue Sky....
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
08.25.2009, 12:21 PM

The TP 40C and the G3 35's are pretty close in performance, looking at graphs from RC Groups user 'everydayflyer'. But in some setups, you will be able to tell a difference, notably your 3s setup.

I also found that I don't use as much throttle to cruise around the track with the G3's compared to the Enerland packs, it's like the nominal voltage is higher, because I would only be drawing maybe 10 amps in the technical parts of the track, and I am pretty sure my finger is not pulling the trigger as much.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#20)
BUSAFIED
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
08.25.2009, 09:57 PM

hmm...that's odd. When I was running the G3 pack, it's like I had to use a little more throttle to keep a respectable speed around the track.

Down the straight, it definitely seemed a little sluggish. Still faster than the 25c NeuEnergy pack, but not close enough to the TP 40c pack as it's 35c rating would suggest.

I don't know if I'll continue with the G3 packs. I mean, they're priced pretty competetively, but I'm just not that happy with the performance. I'll probably stick to the TP 40c packs for now. When the new 43c Enerland packs come out, I'll be gettin my mitts on those babies to try 'em out.

Come to think of it...I do need to place an order.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#21)
big greg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
08.25.2009, 10:04 PM

the crt is a tank! i just did the calculater and your only geared for 27 mph! thats gotta be lame lol , shoot i had my crt on 5s with the 1y and it geared 12/46t it was perfect

Last edited by big greg; 08.25.2009 at 10:08 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#22)
BUSAFIED
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
08.25.2009, 10:13 PM

only 2700kv? Big G...the CRT may be a tank, but that 1.5D is a monster of a motor.

Using the TP 40c 3S on it is almost useless speed. The motor gets hot not from trying to power the truggy, but from all the wheel spin that's going on.

On 4S, that motor is absolutely ridiculous. The tires'll get almost as big as a paper plate from all the power. Run it more than three times and the foam inside the fronts is torn into three different sections. The duct tape I put on the inside of the tires ends up tearing.

That's not to mention all the damage it's done to the drive train. I've blown out an o-ring on the center diff, had to replace the center diff gears once already, rear diff gears are about to give up the ghost, blew the bearings on the front right wheel, bent the center universal drive shafts about 6 times already, bent the front three times and bent the CVD's at least twice.

I love the speed I have with this motor...but damnit if she isn't making me pay for my avarice.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#23)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
08.26.2009, 03:42 AM

Hmm, I find that strange that you are feeling disappointed over the G3's... everything I have read, what RCM Mike has mentioned about them, and my personal experience with them says otherwise. In fact, a guy at the track said when I swapped packs (@ roughly 50% DOD) from an enerland pack to the G3 pack, he thought I had a larger pack in the truck, like more cells, judging by the straight line power. I love these packs. I love em, I love em, I love em.

If they turn out to really deliver on their 4x cycle claim, then they are just super duper.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#24)
BUSAFIED
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
08.28.2009, 02:32 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeropointbug View Post
Hmm, I find that strange that you are feeling disappointed over the G3's... everything I have read, what RCM Mike has mentioned about them, and my personal experience with them says otherwise. In fact, a guy at the track said when I swapped packs (@ roughly 50% DOD) from an enerland pack to the G3 pack, he thought I had a larger pack in the truck, like more cells, judging by the straight line power. I love these packs. I love em, I love em, I love em.

If they turn out to really deliver on their 4x cycle claim, then they are just super duper.

I guess it might just be me, then. They perform a little better than the NeuEnergy 25/50c, but it doesn't seem like it's all that. I dunno...maybe I'm just spoiled with the smaller spur of the buggy and the TP 40c pack.

Then again, at 65c burst, the G3 is down 15c to the TP's 80c. Or, according to the rclipos website, 42.5 amps compared to the TP. The 5000mAh 3S pack is supposedly putting out 400amp bursts. The 5500mAh G3 3S pack is only putting out 357.5amps.

I'd say that both companies are pretty much rating their batteries accurately. The difference between the packs is noticeable...most especially the battery temps. The TP pack is barely breaking a sweat when I use it.

If you really like 'em and you think you have a use for the G3 3S packs, lemme know.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com