RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > RC-Monster Area > Product Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
MGM 16018 vs Quark 125B w/ Neu 1512/2.5D
Old
  (#1)
wallot
RC-Monster Titanium
 
wallot's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,025
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
MGM 16018 vs Quark 125B w/ Neu 1512/2.5D - 09.23.2007, 01:26 PM

After my Quark died (second one) I was tired sending it for repairs so I got mgm16018. I was little bit scared how it will work with my Neu, but after first run all I could say was WOW.

Quark did have problems with low speed runs and there was little but of cogging, just from standstil but it was there. It just needed to get motor moving bit faster. Then it worked smoothly.

But MGM is smooth from standstill, it's incredible how smooth it is, I can crawl next to Novak 4.5 :) No problems with braking. programming through card is simple (as well through pc), it recognized correctly 4 pole motor.
Only the drag brake is too strong with Neu no matter how its setup, but running without it works well and its probably better on the track. I was able to overheat it after like 10min running on full throttle becasue it was mounted temoralily without any airflow but i will fix this.

My maxx is now 5.5kg (12.1lbs) RTR, running od 5S TrueRC 8Ah LiPo with Dimension engineering ubec


Radek
V4 D8 - RX8, XERUN 4168SD
F1-09 - Tekin RS Pro, 17.5t Redline, 2S LiPo
Sakura Zero S - LRP, Saturn 20T, 2S LiPo
*EX-10 Eurus*

Last edited by wallot; 09.23.2007 at 01:27 PM.
 Send a message via ICQ to wallot  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
09.23.2007, 03:51 PM

I'm glad to hear th MGM is working for you. You had the Quark on a Silencer heatsink, correct?

I don't understand how ppl can have 12 lb. trucks... what do you have in them? lead weights?


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
squeeforever
RC-Monster Mod
 
squeeforever's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 6,254
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baton Rouge
09.23.2007, 04:13 PM

His rim and tire combo is a good 2lbs. probably...
  Send a message via AIM to squeeforever  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
wallot
RC-Monster Titanium
 
wallot's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,025
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
09.23.2007, 04:14 PM

yeah i did.

well truck is full of aluminum -
FLM chassis, FLM hybrids, FLM shocktowers, NEw Era Revo knuckles
5S 8Ah lipo wights 2lbs

I have plastic skids, plastic arms so not possible to make truck lighter as FLM stuff made truck indestructible :)

//edit - fixed misspelling :)


Radek
V4 D8 - RX8, XERUN 4168SD
F1-09 - Tekin RS Pro, 17.5t Redline, 2S LiPo
Sakura Zero S - LRP, Saturn 20T, 2S LiPo
*EX-10 Eurus*

Last edited by wallot; 09.23.2007 at 04:54 PM.
 Send a message via ICQ to wallot  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
09.23.2007, 04:38 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by wallot View Post
undestructable :)
'indestructible'

I couldn't stand a heavier truck like that... my Revo 3.3 weights in at a tad over 9 lbs with a 7s A123 pack and 1512 motor, and a Quark with a Silencer epoxied to it. It's fast, can turn fast, awesome handling, and is uber efficient.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
wallot
RC-Monster Titanium
 
wallot's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,025
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
09.23.2007, 04:55 PM

u is so close to i :)

well revo is quite light truck compared to maxx.

yeah tires/rims are little bit over 2 lbs but you cant get any really lighter tires/rims

I can save a lot with like 5Ah flightpower pack but no need really


for example friend's LSP is like 11lbs with 5S lipo and all he has are plastic battery trays and small esc mount.


Radek
V4 D8 - RX8, XERUN 4168SD
F1-09 - Tekin RS Pro, 17.5t Redline, 2S LiPo
Sakura Zero S - LRP, Saturn 20T, 2S LiPo
*EX-10 Eurus*
 Send a message via ICQ to wallot  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
nl12
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
nl12's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 412
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monterey CA
10.10.2007, 10:21 PM

I think a Neu 1515/2.5D would be better for your application
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
wallot
RC-Monster Titanium
 
wallot's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,025
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
10.11.2007, 12:06 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by nl12 View Post
I think a Neu 1515/2.5D would be better for your application
i dont need any more torque. its hard already putting in onto the ground.
motor temps are no problem at all. 1512 is more powerful than xl motors


Radek
V4 D8 - RX8, XERUN 4168SD
F1-09 - Tekin RS Pro, 17.5t Redline, 2S LiPo
Sakura Zero S - LRP, Saturn 20T, 2S LiPo
*EX-10 Eurus*
 Send a message via ICQ to wallot  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
neweuser
RC Monster, the Final Frontier
 
neweuser's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,379
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minnesota
10.29.2007, 09:51 AM

I have run my Quark for over a year with no issues to it really, that is after I set it up right.
I have no cogging at all, so not sure how you were getting that. But glad you like the MGM. :)


"if you've got something to say, say it peacefully"
  Send a message via MSN to neweuser  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
BrianG
RC-Monster Admin
 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
10.29.2007, 10:29 AM

Yeah, Quark and "cogging" don't usually go into the same sentence. Even witha 1512 2d (kv 2600) on 4s, geared 46/16 on my buggy, I could crawl over obstacles without cogging. I wonder if there were issues with that ESC?

Don't forget, the Quark is actually more comparable to the MM (current and voltage wise) and is really meant to be a 1/10 ST ESC, so comparing it to a 160A ESC is not really fair IMO.
  Send a message via Yahoo to BrianG Send a message via MSN to BrianG  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
neweuser
RC Monster, the Final Frontier
 
neweuser's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,379
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minnesota
10.29.2007, 10:33 AM

Brain, I agree. Even though the Quark was "rated" for 6s, it runs best on 4s IMO. I think the MM is more comparable to it however as you said Brain.
The MGM is a whole different catagory I would think.


"if you've got something to say, say it peacefully"
  Send a message via MSN to neweuser  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
tallyram
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
tallyram's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 523
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: tallahassee, fl
10.29.2007, 12:46 PM

from my experience, the quark(125b) is super smooth, bk(12020) is a little rough, and mgm(22418) is really smooth. so far the mgm is light years ahead of the quark and bk, it actually works correctly when staying within its specs. can't say that with the others i've owned!


luxury!
  Send a message via AIM to tallyram  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com